|
12:12:2006:
Help The Coup and Mr. Lif recover from bus crash
The good news is that no
one was seriously injured when two of the most uncompromising and
politically charged acts in rap history, The Coup and Mr. Lif ,
wound up in a tour bus accident last week. But the bad news is that
all of their equipment and much of their personal belongings were
destroyed. According to The Coup's Boots Riley:
We lost everything in
that crash and fire. We were packed to live and do shows on that
bus for a month. Most of us had every stitch of clothing we owned
on there. We lost clothes, computers, recording equipment, cameras,
IDs, phones, keys to cars and homes. We lost cash.We lost all
our damn instruments and equipment to perform with. We were and
are happy to walk away with our lives. But now we're home. Most
of the band touring with The Coup has kids, rent that won't quit,
bills, and holiday expenses coming. We need money, because like
I said the band doesn't have the tools that they make a living
with. Not only did we lose cash and material things on the bus,
but we also were depending on this tour for money to make it through.
The Coup has a Paypal
account for donations and keep checking his site because Mr. Lif
has one on the way. You can send donations on Paypal to the following
address:
thecoupbuscrash@gmail.com
They've contributed greatly
to our world and this is your chance to give back in a time of need.
Boot's
Riley's letter regarding the crash
Allhiphop's
news item on the crash
Official
Mr. Lif site
The
Coup's Myspace page
10:06:2006: NYNT
Award for Literary Excellence... Iggy and the Stooges Rider:
If reading the Times
Book Review or the New Yorker hasn’t yet led
you to the contemporary Swift or Voltaire (or even H.L. Mencken
for christ sakes) you've been searching for, perhaps you've been
looking in the wrong place.
Have you tried the internet
yet?
No, I'm not talking about
Amazon.com, or those literary journals, or any of that drivel.
I am referring to the Smoking Gun - where, in the concert
riders section, you will find a document penned by an unsung man
of letters who, while a bit less subtle than, say, Pope, but more
witty and insightful than our foremost current jester sages like
Chuck Klosterman, or that Gawker dude or whoever, has created what
very well may be the penultimate work of contemporary prose.
The mysterious author's
name is Jos Grain and the document he produced is Iggy and the Stooges'
concert rider. He has written a contractual document that simultaneously
serves its practical purpose while offering a profound commentary
on the human condition. Here you will find a masterful balance form
and function infused with man's most precious truths and, dare I
suggest, perhaps even the secret to the universe. Finally, this
piece, like the better literature of its type, also offers invaluable
insight into the life and work of these fine artists.
I would like to thank Fabio
from Earwax records for alerting me to this proud new addition to
the world's literary canon. Whitout any further ado...
Iggy
and the Stooges Concert Rider
Epilogue: I just got word
from Jos Grain himself that the latest greatest Stooges riders can
be found here.
*
* *
10:02:2006:
Soft Focus, American Hardcore, and Why I'm Not
Going
Writer/musician
Ian
Svenonius of Weird War, Make-Up, Nation of Ulysses,
etc., has been in New York of late filming his new talk show, Soft
Focus for Vice TV. The last three weeks he’s interviewed
Henry Rollins, Ian McKaye, Adrew W.K., Will Oldham, Chan Marshall,
and Genesis P. Oridge (seven people I’d love to witness at
a dinner party). There’s no music, no backdrop, no nonsense,
no corporate product placement or ads on the set. Just a subtle
comic light-dimming followed by an in-depth conversation. I hope
they don’t over-edit it because this is exactly what the world
needs now - not love sweet love, though that’d be nice as
well – but something a bit deeper than soundbites.
I’ve
only been able to attend the first of three tapings, the one with
Rollins
and McKaye.
While Svenonius respectfully quizzed both about a variety of topics,
I couldn’t help but think that, for my world, this is our
“greatest generation.” They both remain completely unique
individuals who, along with quite a few others in the American post-punk
years, built our little corner of the world, band-by-band, record-by-record,
club-by-club, store-by-store, disaffected suburban kid by disaffected
suburban kid. Not only are both still musicians, but McKaye is still
the boss of Dischord and Rollins still has his publishing company.
I don't think I'm being a cynical thirty-something when I imagine
that we’re not going to see the likes of these two for some
time…
The hardcore
generation, despite its faults, was definitely not doing things
to become rich and famous, but anti-rock stars in every sense of
the word, even Greg Ginn (I think). Well aware that theirs was not
the type of music that ever had a chance on the radio, this small
group of folks set up their own universe as an alternative to that
of A&R guys, managers, and publicists. And, while more than
a few records from the hardcore era hold up, the main thing that
survives is not only our touring circuit, or our record store network,
but also the seeds they planted within us… That little pang
of guilt when we sell out, give in, or merely accept things that
we don’t believe in. They offered us a wonderful and uncompromising
world, or stand against the predominant world, that, no matter what
you hear, is still valid in this age when lines are much blurrier
and selling out has become, for most, a necessity.
I don’t
believe that the DIY values are completely antiquated and am aware
of a few circles of young and old folks employing them in various
edges of the music world – in basements, warehouses, art galleries,
and other makeshift venues, putting out CD-R’s, cassettes,
and even 45s. There’s still plenty of music not touched by
the entertainment divisions of multinational corporations, Madison
Avenue, or even the inflated “indie-music” industry
(though sadly, half of the stuff you find here, though indie-ish,
is of that lesser evil).
Which
leads me to my conclusion – a few days after hearing Rollins
and McKaye, I wound up attending the after-premier party for American
Hardcore. For those of you not familiar, this
is a film version of Steve Blesh’s oral history about the
musical/cultural movement divided into regional scenes. I read the
book, which had its merits, and was on the fence about going to
yet another doc about twenty years ago or whatever, but the after-party
was hard to turn down as it included a set by the recently reformed
Flipper,
one of my favorite bands of the era and one that I’ve yet
to see since they've been at it again.
The event
was thrown by Paper magazine and sponsored by Dos Equis
(they both get a shoutout - promotion is working!) and I arrived
just in time to grab a beer and catch the entire set. Flipper was
certainly one of the most confrontational and uncompromising bands
of their era, and watching these unfashionable, weathered, and very
real middle aged men proved they still hadn’t given in more
than an inch or two. That night their banter was more concerned
with immediate issues: demanding the admittance of a kid who couldn’t
get in because he was too young, complaining about the smoking ban,
and, when an audience member said, “fuck the hippies,”
calling him “ignorant” and taking time to explain that
if he had any sense he’d realize the real problem is the corporate
fascist state. They even had Moby, who played with them once in
the early 1980s, join them on bass for “Sex Bomb,” and
then Bruce Loose literally removed the celebrity’s instrument
and kicked the him off of the stage – harsh – but still
loving in an old school way.
What
I think the band didn’t know was that, once the American
Hardcore slideshow began to role behind them, it was an endless
loop of about ten frames that degraded the entire experience even
more than the sponsorships, the venue itself, and half of the guests.
The loop started out with a picture of young Rollins, probably circa
1981, stagediving. The next frame was an ad for Vans. The following
frame was SSD Control. Then an ad for Dos Equis. Then an early-1980s
hardcore crowd. Then something involving Sony Pictures and Paper,
etc. Then something involving late-period Black Flag. These ten
or so frames repeated dozens of times throughout the duration of
the set of nihilistic sludge. Though this display could easily be
read as the incongruity between image and sound in the terms of
the Brechtian V-effect - intended to distance the spectator from
the drama, making a statement by pointing out the irony of the contrasting
sound and image, it seemed lost on most of the crowd. I felt like
I was living the conclusion to A Clockwork Orange and these
folks, who just saw an entire movie about an alternate way of living
seemed to be OK with it. A girl who talked to me told me I was being
a downer. I’m sure Flipper had no idea what was happening
behind them, but, as we now write histories that remove the band
and their values from our own time, closing the door on an era,
that moment at whatever the name of the phoney-ass Chelsea nightspot
(no more shout-outs for lameness) spoke volumes about the meaning
that we’re being told to derive from the entire era (or not
derive at this point). And, while Sony may spread the some of the
virus, it's likely that the kid's'll pick up on the violence and
the aesthetics that marked the movement more than the ethos. I left
feeling the inexplicable desire for one more Dos Equis, a copy of
Paper, a pair of Vans, and any thing released by that trusted media
company Sony.
I guess
I should just do my duty as a twenty-first century citizen and disembody
the moment, leaving it be and merely saying that the band sounded
amazing and the beer was fine....
But all
of us have that little McKaye on our shoulder telling us it’s
all bullshit... Are we supposed grin at the perversity of the fact
that Sony Classics is offering us a portrait of an anti-establishment
movement? If so, that's the worst kind of cynicism... Before you
knock me off of my high Trojan horse (note to media - don't let
me in to anything), in the tradition of blind idealism and old-school
self-righteousness, let me go on the record as saying, SCREW THAT.
I'm refuse. If you really need to find out about hardcore, listen
the records instead...
Of course
I'm a hypocrite in this conversation - the talk show I'm praising
will appear on Vice TV and I put Google ads up here to pay a small
portion of my expenses... Nonetheless, I don't think the better
lessons of the hardcore era, particularly regarding economics and
art, are no longer convincing. I still hope we can continue to learn
from theIan McKayes, Jello Biafras, Corey Rusks, Calvin Johnsons,
or other musicians of the era who took matters into their own hands
and refused to compromise - setting their own terms and their own
economies, finding alternate paths, and even different destinations.
We are still living in the distorted tail of the networks they created
and have the power to continue experimenting with their countercultural
economic and artistic model if we so desire. It's either that or
Mc Nuggets. Maybe it's time we quit being so pragmatic and pick
a side once again.
08:11:2006:
Deadly Snakes Break Up (and Belated GoGoGo Airheart Eulogy)
Earlier this week Deadly
Snakes announced that they were splitting. While I
could really give a rat’s ass about the demise of their fellow
Canadians DFA 1979, the Snakes are another story. And since I never
got arround to commenting on
GoGoGo Airheart’s split a couple of months ago,
I will take this opportunity to kill two stones with one worthless
bird as this is a case of SSDG (same sh*t different genre).
Like GoGoGo Airheart, Deadly
Snakes were an underground institution that never really got the
notoriety that they deserved. Like GoGoGo, they were one of the
best bands going, and hard workers that regularly toured and recorded,
and were even on a great label (in GoGoGo’s case GSL and in
Deadly Snakes In the Red). But after a decade of constant labor,
both of these bands were lucky to get fifty people at their shows
and I’m sure, particularly in this day and age, that they
didn’t make a whole heck of a lot of money on record sales.
And while they quit because
they weren’t into it anymore, the factor that made the difference
in both cases was the lack of return they got for their hard work
and the resulting financial difficulties incurred. I hate to be
a such a Marxiwst about everything, but the indie world has always
been very much about economics in the end. The Deadly Snakes’
Maxwell McCabe-Lokos (Age of Danger) explained:
I think that we're
all getting a little tired of going on tour and playing in Ozona,
Texas for two or three people. Some people can do that until their
eyes fall out.
Ashish Vyas (Hash) of GoGoGo
Airheart elaborated:
Depending on the
size of the city, we'd play in front of 20-80 people who tended
to be the 'hipsters' of their city... What I mean is the kids
who are geeks about music and the culture surrounding it. There
have been countless times where kids have come up to us and said
they started their bands because of us, but my head is now way
bigger than my wallet and I can't pay my rent with my ego!
I apologize for using Pitchfork
for my source material in both cases, but I think both of these
quotes accurately illustrate the frustration of these hard-working,
critically acclaimed veteran bands.
One could speculate all
day about both bands’ failure to achieve indie commercial
success…
They weren’t
with it, or of there times? No, quite the opposite. GoGoGo,
despite being there first, and much better than most bands trying
it, was never able to capitalize on either the post-punk revival
a few years ago or the current Kraut rock resurgence. The Deadly
Snakes, arguably the best of the new crop of garage bands when that
genre was in vogue with youngsters, again, around five years ago,
never hit it. And there are a number of both bands' contemporaries,
many of whom they influenced, who've found much more commercial
success.
They weren’t
released, promoted, booked, etc. correctly? As I said, both
bands were on excellent labels with substantial name recognition
within the right niche groups and decent distribution. Both had
decent PR firms taking care of them and got no shortage of press,
particularly for their most recent releases. I remember complaining
about the venues the Deadly Snakes were booked into last time around,
but overall, they and GoGoGo played at the same general places in
every town where similar bands play. They also both over the years
had candy opening slots for a number of bigger acts. There’s
really nothing that indicates that the people working these bands
weren’t doing their jobs.
They sucked? That
of course is highly subjective. While both were capable of a great
show, GoGoGo could be really messed up (which I actually liked)
and the Deadly Snakes weren't always as showmanly and exciting live
as their contemporaries and one of their singers' voice was definitely
an acquired taste. Either way, there's no shortage of big bands
with these kinds of shortcomings.
If you want my two cents,
it’s that neither GoGoGo or the Deadly Snakes were comfortable
being lumped into movements. Both consistently explored new avenues
and tried as hard as possible to be their own entity. They were
reluctant to give people what they expected and I don’t think
that either band sat still long enough for specific niche groups
or trendmongers to grab onto them in mass. In other words, they
were too restless and individualistic to become static commodities.
AKA they were real artists... trapped
in the bubble of the "geeks about music" fan-base.
Critical acclaim and no
money. Lucky at love but unlucky at cards. As the Snakes said on
their last record, “a bird in the hand is worthless.”
And, as the “American
Pie” guy gushed in his Vincent Van Gough weeper that blared
over the speakers in the deli a couple of nights ago, “This
world was never meant for one as beautiful as you.” Well,
I dunno if "beautiful" is the perfect word in either case.
But they will both be greatly missed...
Adios amigos. Thanks for
the sweat, the tunes, and, most of all, the inspiration.
MEDIA:
Deadly
Snakes, Comprehensive Collection of Great Tunes Stream
(highly recommended!)
Deadly
Snakes, "Gore Veil" MP3
Deadly
Snakes, "I Want to Die" MP3
GoGoGo Airheart, "Mifi" MP3 (2002 - Jay Hough!)
GoGoGo
Airheart, "Double Bummer" MP3 (2005)
08:04:2006: Bummer
in the Summer - Love's Arthur Lee Passes Away at 61
This is the only
thing that I am sure of
And that's all that lives is gonna die
And there'll always be some people here to wonder why
And for every happy hello, there will be good-bye
There'll be time for you to put yourself on
- Love,
“You Set The Scene”
I would
like to make the news more than an obituary section but damn if
the all-time greats aren’t falling off a bit young. Two of
the most important musical minds of the late-1960s, Syd Barret,
and now, Arthur Lee, both notoriously in bad health, have left us
within a few weeks of one another.
Like many
of you, Love’s been one of my absolute favorites a good hunk
of my life. I inherited their very garagy first album from my stepfather,
picked up a copy of their Best of at fourteen, Forever
Changes (sealed in a cutout bin of a new record store) and
found Da Capo (used, after much effort, and, in the process,
an original copy of Four Sail. These things cost very little
at the time ) and, by sixteen, was covering “She Comes In
Colors” with my high school band because we thought “Seven
and Seven Is” was too obvious and we couldn’t figure
out how to play “Stephanie Knows Who” – which
has many more parts in a couple of minutes than the entire side
that is “Revelation.” Forever Changes, which
didn’t hit me at first for being a bit too sappy, became as
great to me as it is to you… both as a late-night and afternoon
record… though I haven’t yet got to hear the CD version
with the out-takes, etc. I guess what I’m trying to say is
that, this man's music has been a big part of my life for a long
time.
Also, after
years of musical obsession and dozens of phases, there are very
few things that have stuck with me consistently from my formative
years to the present, and Love, like early Pink Floyd, is certainly
one of them. I've also talked to a few others who've had the same
experience. While our listening patterns are entirely a spontaneous
organic process, things happen for a reason. In the case of Love,
I think that there’re a number elements that make them stand
out from their contemporaries and followers…
Love photo session that wound up as the cover for the first
two albums |
Arthur
Lee, like Syd Barrett, could be hokey (“the snot is caked
against my pants/it has turned into crystal”), but nonetheless
had an uncanny ability to write well-rounded pop songs that had
unique elements. Particularly in the era with Bryan MacLean (R.I.P.),
there’s nary an early Love song that doesn’t have something
interesting about it. The band’s experimentation, particularly
with the combination of Tin Pan Alley standards, folk, and rock’n’roll
and later with flamenco, chamber music, and psychedelia was as unique
for its time as it is for today. Lee’s inimitable voice, guitar
playing, and general aesthetic are still refreshing and superb.
Love's approach was not of it's time and, therefore, timeless -
the early records are never too dated. Finally, Love, in their prime,
had a great line-up and was simply one of the best rock bands of
all time.
Also, in
a historical context, while certainly some of the finest stuff in
music history was happening in 1966, and we listen to much of it
today, it wasn’t yet mass culture and a handful of visionary
groups that year were a bridge from “Louie Louie” frat
rock, surf, and R&B to psychedelia and modern rock (The Velvet
Underground and The Godz here, 13th Floor Elevators and Red Krayola
in TX, nothing special in San Francisco (Charlatans?, Jefferson
Airplane, Great Society, Warlocks [yuck], etc), Pink Floyd, The
Zombies, Pretty Things, et al in the UK, etc.). But LA had a particularly
fertile musical landscape: the more experimental Captain Beefheart
or Mothers of Invention, or the garage Chocolate Watchband or Music
Machine, or the folk rock of The Byrds and Buffalo Springfield,
the bubblegum folk of Mamas and Papas or Sonny and Cher, or the
California dreamin’ of Beach Boys or Manson, the churning
organ of Anton LaVey, the wall of sound of Phil Spector, or the
entire Hollywood/Vegas schmaltz and standards industry. So this
was an ideal environment for Lee, yet another tasteful Memphian,
an early LSD advocate, and, at first, a drummer, to help fuse the
atypical collection of elements that became Love – and, in
doing so, heavily inform the group that really broke the musical
end of the cultural revolution open commercially in 1967, The Doors.
As
for the band's late period , which was really Arthur Lee solo, his
brilliance is not as apparent, but he nonetheless now and again
still had his moments for many years to come. It could’ve
been because of his burnout do to excessive drug use, or, more likely,
that Bryan MacLean was a bit of an under-rated force in the band,
and that the magic between the two was never recaptured as frequently
as when either were alone. Though he was active for a good chunk
of the last thirty-five years, like the inactive Barrett, Lee will
be remembered primarily for his stellar work in the preceding years.
Regardless, Arthur Lee’s contribution was gigantic and I have
no idea which direction music would’ve gone without him.
If you
want a biographical obituary, go to the links that follow. I feel
like I’m failing and meandering. I wish I could properly express
my sadness regarding the passing of this soul that had such a troubled
existence for the second half of his life yet gave so much to all
of us. I wish I had the right words beyond why his band is important
to me and the world in general. But I don't. But I want to give
some kind of remembrance. I recognize that I'm stuck in the same
ambiguous confusion expressed in many of Love's best songs:
Can you find your
way
Or do you want my vision
It's dark there, they say
But that's just indecision
And in my last inspection
Is this the right direction
-Love, "Que Vida"
Arthur Lee diserves better
than this. Here're a few obits as of press time:
OBITS:
MTV
Billboard
CNN
Pitchfork
ARTHUR LEE/LOVE SITES:
Arthur
Lee
Wikipedia
Official
Love with Arthur Lee Myspace
07:31:2006: "Sad
Journey": Floyd Dixon R.I.P.
“Mr Magnificent,”
Floyd
Dixon, passed away Wednesday at the age of 77.
Floyd Dixon was one of
the many Texas-based artists who moved to Los Angeles in the 1940s
and helped popularize a post-swing style of music that would soon
dubbed R&B. He was a teenage protégé of Charles
Brown himself. And, though he, like many of his Central Avenue compatriots,
was heavily influenced by the Brown’s smooth jazzy take on
blues, Dixon found his greatest success playing a more rudimentary
jump blues style similar to that of his friend Amos Milburn –
a racket that was, in essence, rock’n’roll. And, a few
years into his career found his biggest success in that idiom, the
now-standard “Hey Bartender.” He even had a Lieber and
Stoller hit, “Too Much Jelly Roll” penned for him.
As R&B gave way to
soul, Dixon, like most of his fellow swing-based musicians, faded
into obscurity, retiring to Paris, TX. He made a comeback in the
1980s after a number of his recordings were re-released and, in
1996, shocked everyone with a live album called “Wake Up and
Live!” which proved that he hadn’t lost an ounce of
his either his energy or chops.
One of the youngest members of his generation of Central Avenue
jump blues pianists, Dixon, who was active until the end, was one
of the last standing. Another marker of the end of an era. He was
truly magnificent. In honor of Floyd Dixon’s death, I leave
you with a little hint of his greatness, my personal favorite, the
mysterious Chess version of “Please Don’t Go.”
MEDIA
"Please
Don't Go" MP3
OBITS
LA
TIMES
Jazz
News (Belarus!(
Arkensas
Times
North
Korea Times
07:18:2006:
Kiss Him Deadly:
Mickey Spillane Cashes In His Chips at 87
Except
for a few bands and songs named after his books, Mickey Spillane
doesn’t have a whole heck’ve a lot to do with music.
His obit is however included here because he remains one of the
biggest rock stars to ever publish a book.
In an era
before arena rock, or even rock’n’roll as a mass phenomenon,
critics and contemporaries hated Mickey Spillane because he was
a vulgar pop culture icon. He was a sexist communist-baiting blind-patriot
brut of a writer. His works turned the gratuitous sex and violence
up a notch for Hammett and Chandler’s already racy tough guy
detective novel genre – and, in the process, stretched the
limits for the rest of popular culture in the post-war period. He
was an anti-intellectual who was publicly boasted that he was a
writer instead of an author, his works peanuts instead of caviar,
“the chewing-gum of American literature" – and
this wasn’t self-deprecation. Rivaling Kerouac in the automatic
writing department, he was known to churn out a book in as little
as nine days. Despite the efforts of politicians, critics, and other
arbiters of taste, he was the best-selling writer of the years immediately
following World War II. And, like his fellow crude rock stars, if
nothing else, he was undeniably a distinct sylist.
Another
odd piece of trivia: in addition to a variety of other jobs, Spillane
performed the duties of both trampoline artist and human cannonball
in the circus. He also used his celebrity to make extra cash endorsing
light beer. And, like the rockers playing under the giant Coors
banner at the stadium, it’s difficult to imagine him touching
the stuff.
I can’t
think of anything more rock’n’roll than all of this
– except for the fact that he retired when he found Jesus
and staged a comeback years later in which his work showed no traces
of moral reformation whatsoever.
While I
don’t agree with Mickey Spillane on most points, and don’t
have much of a taste for Mike Hammer, I’ll admit that I’m
a fan of his blunt writing, the exciting way it conveys American
post-war anxiety, and the way it's left ice in my veins. And I can’t
help but think what rock music would’ve been without him.
Guardian
Obituary
Times
Online Obituary
L.A.
Times Obituary
NY
Times Obituary
Mickey
Spillane interview
07:11:2006:
Syd Barrett R.I.P.
Syd Barrett
has, without a doubt, made some of my favorite music of all time.
His songs have remained with me since early on and, though he wasn't
active during my lifetime, I guess I always dreamed that he'd somehow
be back - and, while not probable, as he was living and breathing,
it was within the realm of the possible. Today our unlikely collective
dream is officially impossible as one of the most original musical
minds of the late Twentieth Centuryhas passed away.
More to
come soon. Go to these articles for now...
NME
BBC
The
Guardian
Syd Barrett Site:
Astral Piper
NYNT
NEWS ARCHIVE
|
|